Deputy snubs court foundation ceremony

THE new court building is nothing to celebrate. Deputy Rhoderick Matthews is staying away from tomorrow's ceremony, at which Bailiff Sir de Vic Carey will unveil the new court building's foundation stone.

'It is not, in my view, an occasion in which we can take pride,' said Deputy Matthews.

'It results from events which I regard as forming part of one of the most shameful episodes in recent island history.'

The States decided in October 2002 to appoint architect-led design team HBG to redevelop the site for the new court building, amid much controversy about retaining the 1811 prison building.

A rival tender which included keeping the latter, which was preferred by the Island Development and Heritage Committees, lost out because the Board of Administration said it was unsuitable and did not meet the requirements of court users.

Deputy Matthews criticised the planning, tender and selection process for the project's architect.

He also believed that the States debate, during which members voted to knock down the former prison but keep the 1811 facade,

resulted in the destruction of an important part of Guernsey's heritage.

'The old prison was also of huge significance locally and, especially because of the Victor Hugo connection, could have been a tremendous asset and attraction for our tourist industry.

'The architects that were selected were obviously second-best to the firm which submitted an imaginative and exciting proposal that would have retained the old prison and its surrounding unique and irreplaceable walls.

'Their scheme would also have replaced the mediocre St James' Chambers with a new building of the highest quality, designed to blend in with the existing

court buildings and the

surrounding area.'

Around 80 guests have been invited to the unveiling, which will also be attended by Board of Administration president Roger Berry and Dean of Guernsey, the Very Rev. Canon Paul Mellor.

Guests will also have the chance to see the latest designs for the Royal Court extension.

Deputy Matthews doubted that the design would find favour with the public and criticised the timing of the project.

'It is ironic that it's happening at a time when the States is considering the Education Council's proposals and the Advisory and Finance Committee is calling for a reduction in spending.

'It must surely be in part because the court project has put such a strain on the economy.

'I also noticed that the A and F letter that opposes part of the Education Council's proposals is dealt with by John Langlois, who supported the building of the court.

'You have to ask if people want a new court or buildings at the College of Further Education.'