Waste decisions will be 'for life of a generation'

ISLANDERS could be recycling much more of their waste in future. Roger Dadd, chairman of the panel of inquiry that rejected the proposed '80m. incinerator, said it was crucial to act now to preserve the life of Mont Cuet tip.

'The decision we take as an island will be for the life of a whole generation, 25 years. The worst possible thing we can do is take the wrong decision now,' he said.

'The other risk, because we're proposing not proceeding, is that we fail to preserve the remaining life of the tip at Mont Cuet. Only by bringing in measures now will it be possible to end up with the most suitable solution to the island's needs.'

The report outlines the panel's vision for the future of waste management in Guernsey in both the long- and short-term.

It suggests that immediate action should be taken to secure the export of waste as an interim measure.

Combined with extensive recycling, reuse and reduction schemes, this will help maintain five years' landfill life while alternative technologies become viable. Schemes include banning recyclable waste from Mont Cuet and immediately raising the tipping charge to '100 a tonne.

This would have an instant effect, said Mr Dadd.

'We really have to now start about the process of encouraging the reduction of waste, both domestic and commercial.

'There is a great deal of expertise outside the island that can do this. Jersey is talking to one about bring banks ' civic amenity sites where people can take fridges and TVs.'

He added that there was currently waste going to the tip that did not need to, such as glass collected from pubs and restaurants.

'We're looking for the States and community to work together. That requires education and support, but it's been done very well in other communities.

'From the representations we've had, I'm certain that as a community there's a great willingness to get on and do this.'

He is confident that the public and politicians will see the report as valid. It has been published on the States website and is available at Frossard House.

'It was the States who chose the members of the panel and they chose extremely wisely from within the industry, and because of that they've been able to produce a report that has the very best scope and experience available.

'It's now up to the States if they want to extend forward the recommendations and conclusions.'

He added that the limited feedback had been that the report was very constructive and helpful.

'I'd be surprised if it's not well received. That's not to say everyone will agree with everything in it ' it's wrong to expect that ' but I think the reception will be positive.'