10 deputies label tunnel idea a ‘fantasy project’
BUILDING a tunnel under the St Peter Port sea front has been described as a ‘fantasy project’ by 10 deputies who say they reject the proposal outright.
The States agreed to ask its new development agency to investigate the idea three weeks ago, and since then ongoing public dissent has led the group of deputies, all of whom voted against the idea, to make their stance clear against what they call ‘wildly ambitious’ plans.
They want it dropped as soon as possible by the agency.
‘It isn’t going to cost a few hundred thousands, it would cost millions,’ said Deputy Bob Murray, pictured, who was surprised the project was even being considered.
The Guernsey Press conducted an online poll yesterday. Some 60% of 60 people were against the proposals, with only 25% willing to see them investigated further.
‘Some people were distressed we were even thinking about this at this time – we have a considerable financial shortage,’ said Deputy Murray.
Although an underpass is not the only option, the new development agency has been tasked with considering better options for how to pedestrianise the sea front and limit traffic in the area, which deputies in favour of the idea said was entirely in keeping with plans to enhance the island’s east coast and town.
But Deputy Murray said it detracted from other significant projects currently under way.
‘We were speaking about harbours, which is a key part of the east coast development, then in the blink of an eye we were talking about what we thought was a fantasy project,’ he said.
The group said housing and the cost-of-living were far more important issues confronting the States now. The suggestion was originally put forward by keen cyclist Deputy Lindsay de Sausmarez, who sought a way for traffic to be taken off the Quay, and was backed by 22 votes to 11.
‘[Deputy de Sausmarez] makes a good case, she makes it look very attractive, and although she didn’t specifically say a tunnel, the only alternative is to direct traffic away from Town, and that is not practical,’ said Deputy Murray.
While he appreciated the aim to promote active travel, he said the proposal was reliant on islanders being willing to use active transport.
‘We’re forgetting people’s personal choices – I don’t believe Guernsey is culturally willing to sacrifice its cars. People travel all over the island, you do need to get from A to B to fit your circumstances. It’s not realistic to expect people to do that at this time.’
He said that the public should have a say in such a large-scale project.
‘If we are going to redevelop the east coast, we should give people the opportunity to have a vision. We don’t need to augment what we have, let’s think bigger,’ he said.
Deputies against the proposals:
Sue Aldwell
David De Lisle
John Dyke
Mark Helyar
David Mahoney
Liam McKenna
Nick Moakes
Bob Murray
Lester Queripel
Simon Vermuelen
Deputy Sam Haskins voted against the proposition in the States but has not signed the letter.