Guernsey Press

Salmond inquiry seeks ‘relevant’ material from Lord Advocate

Linda Fabiani, convener of Holyrood’s Committee on the Handling of Scottish Government Harassment Complaints, has written to James Wolffe QC.

Published
Last updated

Scotland’s top prosecutor has been asked to release any “relevant” material the Crown Office has to MSPs investigating the Scottish Government’s handling of harassment complaints against Alex Salmond.

Linda Fabiani, the convener of the committee conducting the inquiry at Holyrood, has written to Lord Advocate James Wolffe QC.

The Committee on the Scottish Government Handling of Harassment Complaints was set up after the former first minister won a legal challenge and £512,250 payout at the Court of Session over the way claims against him were dealt with.

Alex Salmond after the case at the Court of Session (Jane Barlow/PA)

Ms Fabiani also made clear the committee is not considering “the ‘merits’ of the allegations or the conduct of the trial”.

Instead, she told the prosecutor: “The committee is seeking material that the Crown may hold which falls within the committee’s remit – specifically any information, for example, communications between officials, related to the conduct of the judicial review and the Scottish Government’s decision to concede – as well as information concerning the handling of the harassment complaints considered under the Scottish Government procedure as opposed to the merits of any such complaints.”

Barbara Allison received a text message from Scotland’s most senior civil servant saying the ‘battle maybe lost but not the war’ after Mr Salmond’s successful legal challenge (Jane Barlow/PA)

She said the exchange had “been retrieved from her mobile phone in the context of the proceedings in HMA v Alexander Salmond”.

After Mr Salmond’s successful legal challenge, Ms Evans sent a text message to Ms Allison saying the “battle maybe lost but not the war”.

Ms Fabiani has now told the Lord Advocate the committee wants to obtain “relevant information and evidence” that the Crown may have that could help with its investigation.

Sorry, we are not accepting comments on this article.