Jurors asked: Could police mistakes in Stephen Port case have cost lives?
Coroner Sarah Munro QC said the inquests would look at the ‘competence and adequacy’ of the police investigations into his crimes.
Inquests into the deaths of serial killer Stephen Port’s victims will examine whether some of their “lives might have been saved” if police had acted differently.
Opening the inquests on Tuesday, Coroner Sarah Munro QC said responsibility for the murders of four young gay men “ultimately rests with one man only – Stephen Port”.
But unlike Port’s criminal trial, the inquests would look at the “competence and adequacy” of the police investigations into his crimes.
She told jurors they would consider whether “mistakes were made” that delayed Port being brought to justice.
She said: “If you consider things may have gone wrong, think about the extent to which, if at all, that made a difference to the outcome of the investigation.
“We will have to consider had the investigations into the earlier deaths been conducted differently, the lives of those who died later might have been saved.”
The killing spree spanned 16 months, between June 2014 and September 2015.
In 2016, Port was found guilty of the murders Anthony Walgate, 23, Gabriel Kovari, 22, Daniel Whitworth, 21, and Jack Taylor, 25, and handed a whole life order.
Outlining the facts on Tuesday, the coroner said Port’s first victim, fashion student Mr Walgate, was found dead in Cooke Street, Barking, on June 19 2014.
It was decided that the local police team rather than the Met’s specialist homicide command should lead the investigation into his death.
Officers quickly established it was Port who had called an ambulance for Mr Walgate, but when questioned he lied to police and gave no indication that he knew him.
It was a week later before they realised that Port, using the name Joe Dean, had in fact arranged to meet Mr Walgate, who was working as an escort at the time.
Port was prosecuted for perverting the course of justice over the lies he had told police and jailed in March 2015.
But by that time, he had already killed his next two victims, Slovakian Mr Kovari and chef Mr Whitworth.
Within three weeks of each other, they were found dead in St Margaret’s churchyard “remarkably” by the same dog walker, just 300 metres from Port’s flat in Cooke Street, jurors heard.
At the time, Mr Kovari’s death was treated as “unexplained” but not suspicious, and toxicology tests found he had GHB in his system.
When Mr Whitworth was found, he was holding what appeared to be a “suicide note” in his left hand.
The note appeared to say Mr Whitworth was responsible for the death of Mr Kovari in an “accident”.
Ms Munro said the note was a lie, written by Port in an attempt to “cover up” the death, but that only became clear “much later”.
Inquests into the deaths of Mr Kovari and Mr Whitworth in 2015 were set aside at the High Court in the wake of the murder trial.
During the first inquests, a friend of Mr Kovari, John Pape, had queried whether there could be a link with the earlier death of Mr Walgate.
A police officer said it had been considered but no link established.
Giving open conclusions in 2015, a coroner had expressed concerns about “third party involvement” in Mr Whitworth’s case.
Ms Munro to told jurors: “If there appear to have been shortcomings in the way in which the police investigated these deaths, we must consider those shortcomings dispassionately and resist the temptation to look for scapegoats.”
She also warned the jury to “beware the wisdom of hindsight” when considering what the police knew at the time of each of the deaths.
The hearings, which were postponed due to the pandemic, are being held at Barking Town Hall – just yards from where the victims were found dead.
Members of the victims’ families have attended the inquests, which are due to go on for up to 10 weeks. Metropolitan Police Deputy Assistant Commissioner Stuart Cundy was also in court on Tuesday.