Guernsey Press

Critically ill baby’s parents lose another round of life-support treatment fight

Two appeal judges have blocked an appeal bid after a High Court judge said moving to a Rome hospital would not be in Indi Gregory’s best interests.

Published
Last updated

The parents of a critically ill baby have lost another round of a life-support treatment fight.

A High Court judge on Thursday refused to allow Indi Gregory’s parents to move her to a hospital in Rome.

Indi Gregory court case
Indi Gregory’s parents want to move her to a hospital in Rome (Family handout/PA)

But two appeal judges on Saturday dismissed the couple’s appeal bid after considering written arguments.

Lady Justice King and Lord Justice Peter Jackson released a written ruling outlining their decision.

“An appeal would have no chance of success,” said the two appeal judges in their written ruling.

“Indeed we have reached the clear view that after reading all the evidence and arguments that the decision was sadly inevitable and right, and that it was reached with the degree of care that is always appropriate in such a serious matter.”

Mr Justice Peel had concluded that a transfer to Italy would not be in eight-month-old Indi’s best interests.

Dean Gregory outside court
Indi Gregory’s father, Dean, outside court (Jonathan Brady/PA)

They said his decision was “not wrong or unfair” and concluded that there was “no compelling reason” for an appeal hearing.

Mr Justice Peel had earlier ruled that doctors treating Indi at the Queen’s Medical Centre in Nottingham could lawfully limit treatment.

Indi Gregory court case
Eight-month-old Indi Gregory has mitochondrial disease (Family handout/PA)

Lawyers representing the couple, who are both in their 30s and from Ilkeston in Derbyshire, had told Mr Justice Peel how an Italian hospital had now offered to treat Indi.

They had asked Mr Justice Peel to allow the little girl to be moved to the Bambino Gesu Paediatric Hospital in Rome.

Lawyers argued that there had been a “material” change of circumstances since the judge ruled that doctors could limit treatment, and said Indi had a chance of a “longer life”.

Indi Gregory court case
Dean Gregory and Claire Staniforth requested their daughter be moved to a hospital in Italy (Victoria Jones/PA)

Mr Justice Peel has considered evidence at private hearings in the Family Division of the High Court in London.

But he has allowed journalists to attend and said Indi could be identified in reports.

Judges have heard that Indi, who was born on February 24, has mitochondrial disease – a genetic condition that saps energy.

Specialists say Indi is dying and bosses at the hospital where she is being cared for asked for a ruling that doctors could lawfully limit treatment.

Medics say the treatment Indi receives causes pain and is futile.

Her parents disagree and want treatment to continue.

A Christian Concern spokesman said on Saturday that lawyers were considering the next move.

Andrea Williams, chief executive of the Christian Legal Centre, said: “The law is there to protect life and the most vulnerable in our society.

“What is happening in this case sets a very worrying precedent with regard to that principle.

“It is very concerning that a child can be held against the parents’ wishes when they have alternative treatment available.

“Transferring Indi to Italy involves no cost to the taxpayer or the NHS.

“What is it at the heart of this case that is preventing Queen’s Medical Centre from allowing Indi to be transferred to Rome?

“We need reform.”

Sorry, we are not accepting comments on this article.