Guernsey Press

‘I’m innocent’ says Letby after further whole-life order for baby murder bid

Last August, the serial killer nurse was convicted by another jury of the murders of seven babies and the attempted murders of six others.

Published
Last updated

Child serial killer Lucy Letby said “I’m innocent” as she was led from court after being sentenced to an additional whole-life order for the attempted murder of a baby girl.

Earlier this week, the 34-year-old former nurse was found guilty at Manchester Crown Court of the attack on the newborn infant during a night shift in the Countess of Chester Hospital’s neonatal unit in February 2016.

She is already serving 14 whole-life orders for each of those offences committed on the unit between June 2015 and June 2016.

Lucy Letby custody picture
Lucy Letby was convicted at a retrial of the attempted murder of a baby girl in her care (Cheshire Constabulary/PA)

He then told dock officers to take her down and, as she was led away, she turned round and said: “I’m innocent.”

A retrial was ordered on a single allegation concerning the baby girl, known as Child K, after the first jury was unable to reach a verdict but a second jury took just three-and-a-half hours to convict Letby.

About 90 minutes after the little girl’s birth, Letby dislodged the breathing tube through which she was being ventilated with air and oxygen.

Consultant paediatrician Dr Ravi Jayaram caught her “virtually red-handed” as he entered Nursery 1 at about 3.45am and he then went on to intervene and resuscitate Child K.

Dr Jayaram told jurors he saw “no evidence” that she had done anything to help the deteriorating baby as he walked in and saw her standing next to the infant’s incubator.

The Countess of Chester Hospital
The offences took place while Lucy Letby was working at the Countess of Chester Hospital (Jacob King/PA)

From the witness box, Letby told the jury of six women and six men that she had no recollection of the event described by Dr Jayaram and did not accept it had taken place.

Child K was transferred, as planned, to a specialist hospital later on February 17 because of her extreme prematurity and died there three days later.

The judge said that despite Child K’s fragility, her condition at the Countess of Chester was “good” and she was stable on a ventilator before Letby targeted her in the knowledge that a transfer was due to take place.

He told Letby: “I repeat what I have said before, only you know the reason or reasons for your murderous campaign.

“She (Child K) was exceptionally vulnerable and in a place where others were striving to provide her with dedicated medical and nursing care.

“You betrayed the trust of (Child K), her parents and all those working at the hospital. You caused her physical suffering and added psychological suffering to her family.

“During the course of this trial, as you did in the last trial, you have coldly denied any responsibility for any of your wrongdoing and sought to attribute fault to others. You have no remorse.”

Child K’s mother read a victim personal statement on behalf of herself and her husband from the witness box.

“However, you Lucy Letby will never hurt another child or have the privilege and joy that children give.

“Our time and effort that you have absorbed over the years will stop today and our focus will remain on our beautiful children and building the most exciting and love-filled life that we possibly can.”

Letby was tearful at times as Child K’s mother outlined the impact on the couple’s life.

Ben Myers KC, defending, said: “We recognise and acknowledge the sympathy for (Child K’s) family and the grave view taken of this conviction.

“Miss Letby’s position remains she is not guilty of any offence.”

Following sentence, Senior Crown Prosecutor Nicola Wyn Williams, of the Crown Prosecution Service Mersey Cheshire, said: “The savagery of her actions has been difficult for the prosecution team to comprehend and has devastated the lives of the families of these babies.

“We still have no idea why she committed these crimes but the Crown Prosecution Service does not have to prove a motive. We simply need to prove that the defendant committed the crime.”

In May, Letby lost her Court of Appeal bid to challenge her convictions from last year.

A court order prohibits reporting of the identities of the surviving and dead children involved in the case.

Sorry, we are not accepting comments on this article.