Starmer faces more backbench pressure over ‘heinous’ and ‘sexist’ benefit cap

Sir Keir Starmer has come under further pressure to scrap the two-child benefit limit as another of his backbench MPs described the policy as “heinous”.

Writing in The Times, Canterbury MP Rosie Duffield said the policy, introduced by then-chancellor George Osborne in 2015, was “sinister and overtly sexist” and had been the main reason driving her to stand for Parliament.

She said: “The obvious target is the caricature of the ‘feckless’, ‘irresponsible’ people who drop children every few minutes without being able to pay for them, but the subtext is altogether more sinister: it is an attack on women’s right to choose how many children they have.”

Likening the policy to the dystopian society in Margaret Attwood’s novel The Handmaid’s Tale, in which women are deprived of their rights, Ms Duffield said women were being “subjugated according to their social class”.

The new Government has already come under pressure to abolish the cap from campaigners, opposition parties and some of its own backbenchers, with some rebel Labour MPs set to move an amendment to the King’s Speech calling for the policy to be scrapped.

The Government has announced a taskforce to develop a child poverty strategy, led by Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall and Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson, although many of the charities consulted by Ms Kendall earlier in the week have also called for the cap to be abolished.

Commons Leader Lucy Powell told MPs on Thursday: “As an incoming Labour Government, we are absolutely committed to tackling child poverty and all the root causes of child poverty, which is why the Prime Minister announced the Government taskforce looking at these matters yesterday.

“We were clear in our manifesto that the economic circumstances do not currently allow for us to abolish the cap.

“Economic stability is the single biggest thing we can do to ensure that children don’t fall into poverty, because when the economy crashes, it’s the poorest in society who pay the heaviest price.”