A clear vision is needed before going ahead with harbour
WITH reference to the stimulating editorial comment piece in Friday 14 May [Broaden vision for harbours redevelopment], I have to agree entirely with such sentiments. We have a lot to thank the Guernsey Ports team for, including the STSB, Deputy Roffey, the harbour master and especially the unique drive and experience of Stuart Falla MBE. He is right on the money. We have to repeat the vision of a century ago and the Victorian age before that and build big for the future. It all fits together – connectivity, economic development, employment, leisure and so on. But we run the real risk of going down a huge capital engineering path without an overarching sense of purposeful action or clear vision. It is absurd to plan a third of a billion expenditure without looking at water needs, buying off angry lobbying residents and fully considering ferry operations and environmental issues. Do we want more or less parking? Are we trying to encourage or discourage bus use? What is our tourism future?
We cannot possibly make strategic decisions without integrating transport issues on land and sea, our population policy and especially the waterfront arts and leisure seaboard project and the residential and retail life of Town and the Bridge. That is why the most sensible political course is to raise an amber flag to these ideas and amend the main propositions until the whole community and business people and ecologists have a broadly shared vision and common destiny. To go ahead regardless would be politically unwise and imprudent.
JOHN GOLLOP
28, Rosaire Court Apartments
Rosaire Avenue
St. Peter Port
GY1 1XW