Better Transport Plan seeks to rectify past planning shortfalls
WE WRITE in response to the recent article criticising the Better Transport Plan for the north of Guernsey, as highlighted by the Vale Douzaine. While it is important to acknowledge the concerns raised, it is equally crucial to consider the broader context and the potential benefits of these proposals.
Firstly, it is unhelpful to view cyclists, pedestrians, and motorists as separate and competing groups. Many individuals use multiple modes of transport depending on their needs and circumstances. Improvements aimed at people who are cycling and walking often enhance safety and accessibility for all other people using the road, creating a more harmonious and efficient transport network.
It is apparent that the opposition mainly stems from the increased housing development planned for the north of the island. While this is an important issue, it is separate from the transport plan. The plan should be evaluated based on its own merits and its capacity to address existing and future transport needs, rather than being conflated with housing development concerns.
Regarding the Ruettes des Habitants, it is essential to clarify that access will not be restricted to residents only. Anyone with a legitimate need to access a property on these roads will be allowed to do so. For those who would previously use such a road as a means to access another destination, an adequate alternative driving route can be used and, given the driving times we experience in Guernsey, should not cause significant inconvenience.
An interesting point raised by the douzeniers is the potential increase in property values along these ruettes. This suggests an acknowledgement of the benefits these roads bring, such as reduced traffic and enhanced safety, which make these areas more desirable. It is an unintended but positive consequence, indicating the value of these improvements. To object to something because it is good, seems odd.
For residents on major routes, the plan will not alter their current situation. This reassures that the existing infrastructure will continue to serve its purpose without unnecessary changes, such as widening roads to allow more traffic.
Finally, the douzeniers attribute the need for these changes to historical poor planning, lacking an overall view of the necessary infrastructure. The Better Transport Plan provides such an overall view and proposes the remedial action required. It represents a comprehensive approach to correct past oversights and ensure sustainable development in the future. By taking an overarching view, the plan aims to create a balanced, efficient, and safe transport system that serves the entire community.
In conclusion, the Better Transport Plan should be seen as a positive step towards a more integrated and sustainable transport network. It addresses the needs of all road users and seeks to rectify past planning shortfalls. Rather than viewing the plan as favouring one group over another, we should recognise its potential to benefit the community as a whole.
THE BETTER JOURNEYS PROJECT