A case for reform: reducing the number of States members

My plan, which suggests proposals for reducing the size of the States, also would propose extending the term of service from the current four years to six, and this I suggest presents several compelling benefits. Here’s why I believe this could be a step in the right direction for Guernsey’s political future.

1. Increased efficiency and focused decision-making

Currently, with 40 States members, there is often a risk of overlap in responsibilities, prolonged debates, and occasionally gridlock on key issues. Reducing the number of representatives would lead to a more focused decision-making process. Fewer member could mean more streamlined discussions and faster progress on critical issues such as health, infrastructure, and economic development.

With just two members per parish, the States would also benefit from a more balanced geographic representation. Each parish would have an equal voice at the table, ensuring that local issues are properly considered without the dilution that can sometimes happen in a larger assembly.

2. Stronger local representation and accountability

Under my proposed model, each parish would elect two representatives to serve for six years. This structure would encourage a closer connection between the electorate and their representatives, as the elected officials would be directly accountable to a smaller, more defined constituency. Voters would know exactly who is representing their interests, creating a stronger link between the local population and their States members.

Furthermore, with only two members representing each parish, there would be no room for ambiguity or shifting responsibility. Every decision, action, or lack thereof would be traceable to the individuals chosen by their parish. This transparency would foster greater trust in the political process and allow voters to more easily hold their representatives accountable for their performance over the longer term.

3. Cost savings for the public

Another advantage of reducing the number of States members is the potential for significant cost savings. Fewer representatives would mean a reduction in salaries, allowances, and administrative support, all of which could help ease the financial burden on Guernsey’s taxpayers. These savings could be redirected towards essential public services, such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure development, directly benefitting the community.

The extended six-year term also reduces the frequency of elections, which are costly and time-consuming. By holding elections less frequently, the island could save money while still maintaining a healthy democratic process.

4. Encouraging long-term planning

With a six-year term, States members would have the opportunity to focus on long-term planning rather than short-term political gain. The extended term would allow representatives to initiate and see through projects that require time to come to fruition. Whether it’s improvements in healthcare, housing, or the island’s environmental policies, the ability to work on initiatives over a longer period would benefit Guernsey as a whole.

Currently, the four-year election cycle can sometimes lead to short termism, where members focus on quick wins to secure re-election. A six-year term would reduce this pressure, allowing members to concentrate on meaningful, sustainable change rather than immediate results.

5. A stronger, more cohesive government

A smaller group of States members would also encourage greater collaboration. With fewer representatives, working relationships would naturally become tighter, fostering a more cohesive and united government. This would be particularly beneficial when tackling complex issues that require coordinated efforts across departments and political ideologies. I also believe that party politics should be banned from the assembly as every member should be working for the benefit of the island and not toeing the party line.

Moreover, with two representatives per parish, the States would maintain a clear structure that reflects Guernsey’s traditional parish-based governance, while modernising its operation for the demands of the 21st century.

Conclusion: A forward-looking reform for Guernsey

Reducing the number of States members from 42 to a more manageable two per parish, and extending their term to six years, represents an opportunity to create a leaner, more effective government for Guernsey. I feel it would result in a stronger connection between representatives and their communities, improved efficiency in decision-making, and long-term savings for the island’s taxpayers. While I am fully aware the change would require careful planning and debate, I believe the potential benefits I have outlined suggest that now is the time to consider this reform as a serious option for Guernsey’s future governance.

As the island looks to adapt to the challenges of a rapidly changing world, a more focused and accountable political system could provide the foundation Guernsey needs to thrive.

Name and address supplied