Guernsey Press

Trial begins of parents of boy accused over Serbia school shooting

Kosta Kecmanovic, 13, has been held in a mental institution since the attack in which 10 people died.

Published

A trial started on Monday in Serbia for the parents of a teenager who is accused of killing 10 people and injuring six in a mass shooting at his school last May.

The suspected killer, 13-year-old Kosta Kecmanovic, has been held in a mental institution since the attack and cannot be held criminally liable under Serbian law because of his age.

His father and mother were charged with a “serious act against general safety” for failing to safeguard the weapon and ammunition used in the shooting.

The High Court in the capital, Belgrade, decided to keep the entire proceedings closed to the public despite calls by the defence lawyers that they be open. The couple, reportedly embraced in the courtroom and wept together, according to local media reports.

Serbia Shooting Trial
TV cameras on standby as reporters wait in front of the High Court in Belgrade, Serbia, on Monday as the trial began behind closed doors (Darko Vojinovic/AP)

The two attacks triggered months of protests against Serbia’s populist President Aleksandar Vucic for allegedly creating a culture of violence in a country that went through a series of bloody wars in the 1990s.

Kecmanovic’s father faces additional charges, including an accusation of training the boy how to shoot without properly guarding the weapons at their home. The manager of a shooting range and an instructor also have been charged.

Serbia has one of the highest gun ownership rates in the world.

Chief prosecutor Nenad Stefanovic told state RTS broadcaster that he expects “a free and fair trial”.

The defence lawyers said Monday they are against keeping the trial closed to the public.

“Today the court made a decision to exclude the public in the entire course of this procedure, stating that this is done to protect the interests of minors and some private interests of the participants in the procedure,” lawyer Irina Borovic said. “Our position is that the decision of the court was absolutely hasty.”

Sorry, we are not accepting comments on this article.