Things to know about this week’s evidence on the Titan sub disaster

Last year, five people hoping to view the Titanic wreckage died when their submersible imploded in the Atlantic Ocean.

This week, a US coast guard panel that is investigating the Titan disaster listened to four days of evidence that has raised serious questions about whether warning signs were ignored.

The panel plans to listen to another five days of testimony next week.

Here is what witnesses have been saying so far:

– The lead engineer says he would not get in the Titan

When giving evidence about a dive that took place several years before the fatal accident, lead engineer Tony Nissen said he felt pressured to get the Titan ready and he refused to pilot it.

“I’m not getting in it,” Mr Nissen said he told Stockton Rush, the co-founder of OceanGate, the company that owned the Titan.

Mr Nissen said Mr Rush was difficult to work for, made demands that often changed day-to-day, and was focused on costs and schedules.

Mr Nissen said he tried to keep his clashes with Mr Rush hidden so others in the company would not be aware of the friction.

– The Titan malfunctioned a few days before its fatal dive

Scientific director Steven Ross said that on a dive just a few days before the Titan imploded, the vessel had a problem with its ballast, which keeps vessels stable.

The issue caused passengers to “tumble about” and crash into the bulkhead, he said.

“One passenger was hanging upside down. The other two managed to wedge themselves into the bow.”

He said he did not know if a safety assessment or hull inspection was carried out after the incident.

– It was not the first time the Titan had problems

A paid passenger on a 2021 mission to the Titanic said the journey was aborted when the vessel started experiencing mechanical problems.

“We realised that all it could do was spin around in circles, making right turns,” said Fred Hagen. “At this juncture, we obviously weren’t going to be able to navigate to the Titanic.”

He said the Titan resurfaced and the mission was scrapped. Mr Hagen said he was aware of the risks involved in the dive.

“Anyone that wanted to go was either delusional if they didn’t think that it was dangerous, or they were embracing the risk,” he said.

– One employee said authorities ignored his concerns

Operations director David Lochridge said the tragedy could possibly have been prevented if a federal agency had investigated the concerns he raised with them on multiple occasions.

Mr Lochridge said that eight months after he filed a complaint with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, a caseworker told him the agency had not begun investigating and there were still 11 cases ahead of his.

By that time, OceanGate was suing Mr Lochridge and he had filed a countersuit.

A couple of months later, Mr Lochridge said, he decided to walk away from the complaint. He said the case was closed and both lawsuits were dropped.

“The whole idea behind the company was to make money,” Mr Lochridge said. “There was very little in the way of science.”

After Mr Lochridge’s testimony this week, the federal agency responded that, at the time, it had “promptly referred” his safety concerns to the coast guard.

– Some people had a rosier view

Renata Rojas, a member of the Explorers Club which lost two paid passengers in the fatal dive, struck a different tone with her evidence.

She said she felt OceanGate was transparent in the run-up to the dive and she never felt the operation was unsafe.

A passenger on a previous dive, Ms Rojas was volunteering with the surface crew when the Titan imploded.

“Some of those people are very hardworking individuals that were just trying to make dreams come true,” she said.