Current election methods don't work in Sark

In that explanation he alludes to the opportunity for 'oddballs and bigots' to gain a platform. We are of the opinion that it is not only proportional representation that gives that opportunity; we have our fair share elected here.

What we are saying is that the much-lauded system of electing our current government, that some in Guernsey seem to favour, does not work, especially when used as it is here. Perhaps Peter Roffey, from the distant shores of Guernsey, is a supporter of the so-called 'most democratic system of government imaginable' which doubtlessly looks perfect from afar.

In reality the 'feudocracy' that exists here is used as a tool by those that don't want, nor can even imagine, a level and representative playing field for every resident. The misuse of power and our tax pounds to perpetuate the so-called 'feud' is the reason why Sark First wants a platform to be available in Chief Pleas. We can see no other way to influence what is happening in Sark. A government that uses its energy and resources on improving the lot of the ordinary tax- paying islander, encouraging business and investment is all we ask for.

We are not in 'the other party' by choice, we are faced with being ostracised and disenfranchised for having a different opinion. What we face here is, 'if you're not with us then you must be against us', which leaves us with no choice but to lobby for change. Having a different opinion does not mean we don't have the interest of Sark at heart, but it does mean we have no platform on which to express those opinions.

This is not just 'a feeling of disenfranchisement', it's very real, as graphically demonstrated by the president of Chief Pleas when addressing the newly selected Conseillers after the recent non-election, where he instructed them not to concern themselves with minority opinion or pressure groups and that they were there to represent the majority that voted them in.

Interestingly, no vote actually took place.

Recently at the State Opening of Parliament, the newly elected government pledged, through the Queen's Speech, that it 'will legislate in the interests of everyone in our country. It will adopt a one nation approach, helping working people get on, supporting aspiration, giving new opportunities to the most disadvantaged and bringing different parts of our country together... and will continue with its long-term plan to provide economic stability and security at every stage of life.'

The contrast between the aims and purpose of Sark's government and that of the UK are plain for all to see, yet no change is forthcoming, not from Sark, not from Guernsey, not from the Ministry of Justice in the UK, so perhaps the only resolution will come from the European Court of Human Rights itself.

Mr Roffey muses that the solution is beyond both himself and other outsiders, it would also appear to be beyond our present Government. Well, someone has to change it and that's exactly what we are petitioning for.

SARK FIRST.