The States’ latest debate on Alderney Airport provoked anguish and relief.
Anguish because it fully exposed the farcical and reckless decision that Alderney, with a population smaller than St Andrew’s, needed a longer and wider runway to take 72-seater aircraft, together with a grandiose terminal building, at twice the cost of the more realistic project agreed before the pandemic.
Not a single deputy is in favour of this folly today, tenders for it having predictably reached nearly £40m., but why were a majority of them earlier this term? Was it out of almost tribal loyalty to the former Policy & Resources Committee then near the peak of its powers? Executive government, you say?
Alderney needs commitment, the States needs ambition, but hopefully this saga will be a timely lesson to the next Assembly about remaining grounded and pragmatic.
Relief now is belated but welcome. Yvonne Burford was right to persist with a more rational vision, suddenly widely accepted, to replace Alderney’s crumbling runway with ‘the lowest possible cost and most practical and pragmatic’ refurbishment and to license a single airline to use a fleet of small aircraft to re-establish the traditional Channel Islands route network.
All the islands were well-served by the decisions made on Friday, although Alderney still desperately needs a new runway, and it must have one as a matter of urgency.
You need to be logged in to comment. If you had an account on our previous site, you can migrate your old account and comment profile to this site by visiting this page and entering the email address for your old account. We'll then send you an email with a link to follow to complete the process.